Thursday, July 2, 2009

Project Management | How do you know a Project is in Trouble

Warning Indicators of a Project in Trouble

What are the Warning Indicators of a project in trouble?

I am firmly of the opinion, based on many years of experience and observation, that the most common causes of project failure are people related, not due to failures of methodology or technology or problems with location or tool-sets.  Most project failure is a failure of effective management. 

One of the most common failures of project management is the failure to notice or act on the early signs of a project in trouble.

There are many common early warning indicators of projects that are failing, and I have listed some of these below:

1. Lack of involvement, or ineffective involvement of Sponsor

2. Low morale of project team

3. Project Team working long hours consistently

4. Failure to get documents signed off (in particular requirements)

5. Poor relationship with business delegates (us and them mentality)

6. Project schedule not updated regularly or accurately

7. Risk and Issue Logs out of date or not populated

8. Significant scope changes

Let's look at each of these indicators to review why they are important.

Lack of involvement, or ineffective involvement of Sponsor

The sponsor role is absolutely crucial to achieving a successful project outcome. As the owner of the business outcome and the project business case they need to be informed of project progress and involved in the project on a consistent regular basis.  One of the key roles is to be available to support the project team if they come up against political or organisational issues.   They also need to follow up to ensure the project is on track or if not that there is a plan in place to bring the project back on track.

Low morale of project team

Low morale of the project team is usually indicative of other issues or concerns.  Whatever the cause, the problem needs to be understood and steps taken to address the issue.  

Project Team working long hours consistently

This is always a danger sign, especially in the early or middle stages of a project.  The real problem is that short bursts of working long hours may not be a major problem, but if the team (or certain individuals in the team) have to continually work long hours then there is a serious problem to be understood and addressed.  The impact of working long hours for long period are many and varied, but this is definitely not a good thing and needs to be resolved.

Failure to get documents signed off (in particular requirements)

Again, there may be many reasons as to why documents may not get signed-off or approved, but none of them are positive in terms of impact on the project.  Also, the impact of having documents unapproved is potentially very serious as this is often the cause of major scope management issues later in the project.  This issue needs to be tackled early and if necessary the project team must escalate to line management and project sponsor early as failure to manage scope change has spelt the death of many projects.

Poor relationship with business delegates (us and them mentality)

This is very serious potentially as once again it can be the outward signs of user/business discontent for any number of reasons and must be addressed.  It is often caused by poor or ineffective communications or processes, but whatever cause it needs to be addressed quickly.

Project schedule not updated regularly or accurately

Again while it may not appear to be a serious problem in itself, it is an indicator that all is not well.  Failure to update or review the schedule regularly indicates that the PM is not using the schedule to run the project and this is very serious, as the impact of various changes can only be determined by updating the schedule for any complex serious of inert-related endeavours (which is the what a project is).  It is often an indication that the PM is over-loaded or else does not have the skills required to plan and manage the project.

Risk and Issue Logs out of date or not populated

This is another key indicator that something is wrong, or at least that the project team is not following due process.  Failure to update risk and issue logs means that the risk and issues may not be being managed and this is potentially deadly.  

Significant scope changes

As with the other items this is a very serious warning indicator as scope change can be the result of a number of project failings.  Whatever the case, the causes of the scope changes if they appear to be significant need to be addressed.

Summing-up

  • So, all of the items noted are warning indicators of a project in trouble.  

  • If corrective action is taken early enough, any of the underlying issues or concerns can be addressed before it is too late.

  • Certainly projects can be turned around, but only if the issues are identified and addressed early enough.  

  • This requires open and honest communication between the various parties involved, and an agreement on a course of action to correct the problems.  

  • This can be very difficult in the early stages when the project team, the sponsor and the key business areas may all be carried away with the euphoria of the event.

  • It could be that some form of mediation is required to resolve issues.

  • But, if there are things that are not right, it is critical to fix them early before the costs of correction (or in the worst case, the costs of project cancellation) mount.

  • So be valiant and escalate your concerns, in the knowledge that you will ultimately be doing the organisation a great service.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Project Management| What is a Successful Project

What is a Successful Project?

People often do not understand the difference between delivering a successful project and project management success.

But there is a real difference as I will try to explain.

The essential measure of a successful project is that it delivered a successful outcome to the business. This is largely the responsibility of the project sponsor.

Project Management success on the other hand is delivering a project to the agreed Scope, Time, Cost and Quality, while maintaining a customer relationship and not burning out the project team.  this is largely the responsibility of the project manager.

So what are the different measures of project management success?

  • The project must have been delivered to the agreed Scope, Time, Cost and Quality.

  • The customer must be happy with the way the project management was carried out which means that the communications in particular, and the various other aspects of the project management, must have been performed professionally.

  • Another aspect of successful project management which is almost totally over-looked is the morale and health of the project team.  Project managers who burn-out team resources are not managing corporate resources effectively and the long-term cost to the organisation is usually totally understated.

  • Finally there is the overall quality of the Project Management. Here we are measuring how well the project manager managed the full suite of project management competencies including management of planning, communications, risks / issues, team and vendor.

The Post Implementation Review (PIR) is a useful tool for measuring and reporting the project management success against the stated measures.  thgese measures go further than just reporting whether the project was delivered on time, within budget, and to scope. 

What are the measures of project delivery success?

  • The project management needs to be successful i.e., all the items listed above

  • It is also critical that a successful business outcome is delivered:

  • With respect to increased revenues or decreased costs

  • With respect to the expected time period when these benefits would be realised.

Usually, unlike project management success, the project benefits realisation is not immediate.  Most projects will not deliver the full benefits until sometime after implementation, possibly even 2 or more years.  This means that the project team will have been disbanded long before the benefits are realised.

The Post Project Review (PPR) is a useful tool for measuring the benefits realisation for the project.

Who is responsible for project success?

Obviously the project manager is responsible for the various project management success measures.

But the delivery of the business outcomes is the responsibility of the sponsor.

This is where it gets very tricky.

If the project fails to deliver then there may be a number of causes. Some of the underlying causes may well be attributed to failures of the project management, but ultimately the delivery of the business benefits are the responsibility of the project sponsor.

The project manager may have put together the business case, but the content is the responsibility of the sponsor.  The sponsor is therefore accountable for the documented assumptions, and for the realisation of benefits from the project.  

So to summarise then, project success incorporates the measurement of project management success in addition to the delivery of the planned business benefits, and cannot be measured fully until the benefits realisation period has passed.

 

 

blogger templates | Make Money Online

type='text/javascript'/>